October 16, 2007
Theoretical hypothesis on paranormal photography.
John Mizzi
I believe that we may able to improve our chances of recording
paranormal activity through the use the Flicker factor threshold. I now it sounds kind of corny but it is a true scientific fact. A fact, which corroborates my hypothesis. Originally I felt the Persistence of vision hypothesis
would be the corroborating factor but it has since been proven that there are basic flaws in this theory.
So let us talk more about my theory and how the flicker factor threshold plays into it. I have been doing a
lot of studies on Electronic voice phenomena or hereafter called evps. I have found that amongst other traits they seem to be recorded at a different rate of speed than normal voice. Most of the time faster but sometimes
slower. I then began wondering if there recorded voices are not at speed does that mean that their whole beings are existing at a certain speed? Just like when a dog can hear certain pitches and we cannot? Maybe we can only see
images at a certain speed this would account for paranormal images only appearing for a split second or two and more pronounced at night. Also they seem to be appearing more as dark shadows out of the corner of our eyes (In our
periphrial vision) another theory is that they draw on electrical energies. But why do we assume that it is power they want IE current could it be that they are requiring 60 hz (Frequency?) Remember that there are more
properties to electricity than voltage. Please keep in mind the 60 Hz factor of mass-produced electricity.
Now let us look at the flicker factor threshold or FFT for short. Some interesting things about the FFT is that
the best frequency for us to see images clearly are at 60 hz hence why commercial application of electricity shuts off and on at 60 times a second our eyes do not see the dark times only the light times Because of FFT . What if
the paranormal images are traveling or shutting off at more or less than 60 he a second would we still be able to see them? Certain properties of our eyes seem to also correlate with this theory, remember how I mentioned that
we tend to see more paranormal movement or images out of our periphial vision? Well FFT tens to be more sensitve at the receptors in peripheral vision. All artificial light tends to flicker at about 60 he except fluorescent
bulbs they tend to flicker at about 120 he because of the ballast needed to drive them. So of course you ask then why don’t we see under fluorescent light? Well how do we know that they are living under these exact frequencies?
They could be at 61.2 or 67.6 or 98.1543 we don’t know. However in writing this another reason that they are living in a different frequency that ours is that have you ever noticed that we can’t hear evps but they can be
recorded? Have you also noticed that we can’t hear radio signals but radios can interpret them? Maybe we cant hear them because they occurring at a frequency we cant hear but electronics can pick up by the way on a standard
tape recorder of any kind the erase head frequency is at 60 he. Hopefully you can start to see the correlations
So how do I prove my theory? I have come up with a plan for device that can shed light at any frequency
I want. If I set up a Video and ask a psychic to let me know when they feel a spirit is near I can begin to record while changing the frequency of the light if I get results then I will have a frequency counter hooked up so I
tell what frequency works best and I will have the photography to prove it.
We will begin experimentation shortly, and results will be posted in an article to this website.
